TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 20, 2018
Index of VWC-EIS, Objection Issues and Responses. 33 issues addressed
United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service
Rocky Mountain Regional Office
Response to Objections on the Village at Wolf Creek Access Project, Rio Grande National Forest
My post of the "Index of the VWC-EIS, Objection Issues and Responses" has been amazingly well visited. Ironically, I also put together a series of posts of highlights from those 33 responses. Then I ran out of steam and it didn't seem important, and other matters were, and I was gone, now I'm thinking perhaps it's more important than I thought and that it would be good to post them after all.
___________________________________________________________________
United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service
Rocky Mountain Regional Office
Response to Objections on the Village at Wolf Creek Access Project, Rio Grande National Forest
November 2018 Village at Wolf Creek Access Project Draft 11/15/18
Objection Issues and Responses
Contents
Issue 7: Alternatives involving mitigation measures and ANILCA terms and conditions were not analyzed
Issue 8: The no-action alternative is inappropriately dismissed
Issue 9: The Forest Service failed to incorporate the input of several key cooperating agencies
Issue 10: ANILCA and existing Forest Service regulations do not require enhanced road access be provided to the federally encumbered Leavell-McCombs Joint Venture parcels
