Showing posts with label land protection. Show all posts
Showing posts with label land protection. Show all posts

Thursday, September 25, 2014

Rocky Mountian Forests at Risk



I came across this report that seems worth passing along.  Something to think about while we wait for the Rio Grande National Forest to come out with their overdue Environmental Assessment of the Red McComb's Alberta Park land swap proposal.

This seems a fitting reminder that we are living in the 2010s and our natural and business world is rapidly changing before our eyes - beware of 1980s speculative pipe dreams - their time has passed into yesteryear.  The future needs as much of the Rio Grande River watershed and riparian system protected as possible.  

Red McComb's plan only promises destruction of that all important high mountain watershed and biologically productive wetlands with unavoidable damaging consequences to all down stream users of the interstate, international Rio Grande River.



Rocky Mountain Forests at Risk
http://www.ucsusa.org/sites/default/files/attach/2014/09/Rocky-Mountain-Forests-at-Risk-Full-Report.pdf

Confronting Climate-driven Impacts from Insects, Wildfires, Heat, and Drought

Americans revere the Rocky Mountains for their aesthetic, environmental, and economic value. The Rockies are home to some of the crown jewels of the national park system, including Yellowstone, Grand Teton, Glacier, and Rocky Mountain National Parks.


These parks alone receive 11 million visitors each year and generate more than $1 billion annually in visitor spending. Another 60 million people visit the region’s 37 national forests each year.

Today, however, the forests of the Rocky Mountains are facing a triple assault: tree-killing insects, wildfires, and heat and drought. If allowed to continue unchecked, these stresses and their impacts could fundamentally alter these forests as we know them.

Human-caused global warming is driving these detri- mental effects by bringing hotter and drier conditions, which not only cause their own effects but amplify those of other stresses. An exceptionally hot and dry stretch from 1999 to 2003 produced unusually severe impacts on the region’s forests. If these trends continue, even hotter and drier con- ditions could become commonplace, leading to even greater effects on Rocky Mountain forests.

This report documents the latest evidence on how climate change is already disrupting the forests of the Rocky Mountain region and what scientists project for the decades ahead, and suggests how we can best meet these challenges. 

Lead authors
Jason Funk Stephen Saunders
Contributors
Todd Sanford Tom Easley Adam Markham
September 2014 

[ contents ]
  1. iv  Figures, Tables, and Boxes
  2. v  Acknowledgments
1 Executive Summary   
Chapter 1
5 A Cherished Landscape at Risk    
Chapter 2
9 Increases in Tree-Killing Insects   
Chapter 3
13 Increases in Wildfires 
Chapter 4
19 Impacts of Heat and Dryness on Forests 
Chapter 5
24 Effects on Iconic Tree Species of the Rocky Mountains 
Chapter 6
38 Present and Future Climate Change in the Rocky Mountains 
Chapter 7
44 What We Can Do 

47 References



Monday, May 12, 2014

Colorado Fracking Site Flooding September 2013, etc.

This is slightly off topic, except for sane land use/appreciation/protection aspect and it's another Colorado issue.   
I'm embarrassed it took me so long to notice the video.

Colorado Fracking Site Flooding September 2013 HD

Sunday, September 9, 2012

MAPS and such



Alternative 3 - ANILCA Road Access - simulation 4.10-10 page 8-39


Alternative 3 - Land Exchange - simulation 4.10-8 page 8-37


CRITICAL VIEWPOINT LOCATIONS - Simulation 4.10-1 page 8-30


Figure 3.6-1. Vegetation Type Map, page 8-23 


Figure 3.6-2. Vegetation Structural Stage Map, page 8-24



These maps show the wetlands areas.  
Red McComb's faustian bargain with the RGNF is that by removing the southwest expanse of wetlands and giving LMJV the uphill section north of his current parcel that somehow the watershed won't be impacted as much.  Seems to me either option will severely disrupt the hydrology of Alberta Park and adversely impact this headwaters to the Rio Grande River. 

Also on a more personal note, I've had a couple locals tell me that one of those small lakes has been sanctified by virtue of being where the ashes of a number of loved ones have been spread over the years.  Such considerations hardly stand in the way of developers, still it's another heart ache tearing up this watershed will inflict.


Figure 3.7-1. Waters of the U.S. Map, page 8-26 


Figure 3.9-1. Lynx Habitat Types LAUs & Linkage Map, page 8-27


Figure 2.4-8. Alternative 3. ANILCA Road Access, Moderate Density Development Concept, page 8-16 


Figure 2.4-6. Alternative 2. Land Exchange Maximum Density Development Concept, page 8-14 


Figure 3.1-1. Surface Water Features and Watersheds, page 8-18 


~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~  
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~  

Dear Friends of Alberta Park and Wolf Creek, 
we have this one moment (September) to tell the Rio Grande Forest Service and the US Department of Agriculture's powers-that-be what a destructive boondoggle this luxury Village at 10,500± elevation would be.

But, they'll never listen to you, if you don't contact them!
Here's where to do that, but you need to do it now, September:


Commenting on This Project
The Forest Service values public input. Comments received, including respondents’ names and addresses, will become part of the public record for this proposed action. Comments submitted anonymously will be accepted and considered; however, anonymous comments will not provide the agency with the ability to provide you with project updates. The Forest Service wishes to provide you with as many opportunities as possible to learn about our activities.

Official Deadline for comments: 9/30/2012. (or is that Friday the 28th, or Monday the 1st?)


Thursday, September 6, 2012

Massive Forest Die Off in and around Alberta Park, Wolf Creek Colorado

{updated 9/7/12}





Why would anyone still consider building a multi-million dollar "Luxury Village" in the dying forest at and around Alberta Park?  

The prognosis is that an extreme fire event will occur up there in the foreseeable future. { I've been sent a message from a Rio Grande National Forest official who points out that the Spruce forest in Alberta Park itself, though dying in front of our eyes is in a location where it could exist, dead and standing, for quite some time before succumbing to forest fire.  Interesting, though it is, I don't see how this materially alters the sales viability of a luxury village in a dead, but standing forest.   
See the note near the bottom of this post}

Given this situation wouldn't it be a better idea for USDA-RGNF officials to think past that imminent event and consider how important a hydrologically unmolested Alberta Park Fens-land and wetland matrix will be for the future recovery process from the damages this inevitable forest fire will inflict on this Rio Grande River Basin Watershed?

Why don’t USDA-Forest Service officials begin to proactively pursue a strategy of encouraging Mr. Red McCombs to return his Alberta Park parcel to the Rio Grande National Forest, or perhaps to a land conservancy group?

To support the logic behind this suggestion link to this report:



According to the Colorado State Forester, the aftermath of the mountain pine beetle epidemic will require as much attention as the outbreak itself – including attention from private landowners.

The forest health report provides a comprehensive overview of forest insect and disease concerns in the state.


Monday, March 1, 2010

* Who's Who of Who to Contact

Saturday, February 20, 2010

The driver:
Mr. B.J. "Red" McCombs
http://www.koontzmccombs.com

The developer:
Mr. Clint Jones

12117 Bee Cave Road, Suite 240
Austin, Texas 78738

512-402-1400
clint@haljonesdev.com

The congressman:
Honorable US Representative John Salazar

326 Cannon HOB

Washington, DC 20515

202-225-4761
http://www.house.gov/salazar/contact.shtml

Aide to Congressman Salazar:
John Whitney
970-259-1012

John.whitney@mail.house.gov

Mineral County Commissioners

Jim Adelman, Chuck Fairchild, Karl Kolisch

lizsherrie@yahoo.com

Rio Grande County Commissioners

Doug Davie, Robert Hagedorn, Dennis Murphy

rgcommissioner@riograndecounty.org

Archuleta County Commissioner – District 1

John Ranson

jranson@archuletacounty.org
Archuleta County Commissioner – District 2
Clifford Lucero

clucero@archuletacounty.org
Archuleta County Commissioner – District 3

Robert Moomaw
rmoomaw@archuletacounty.org

Town of Pagosa Springs

Ross Aragon, Mayor
archie@frontier.net

Darrel Cotton, Council Member
noki@pagosa.net
Stan Holt, Council Member
pagosaholt@centurytel.net
Jerry Jackson, Council Member
pagosasprings@hotmail.com
Shari Pierce, Council Member
sharipierce@pagosasprings.co.gov

Don Volger, Council Member
ddvolger@gmail.com

Mark Weiler, Council Member
mweiler@parelli.com

U.S. Senator Mark Udall

Hart Office Building 
Suite SH-317

Washington, D.C. 20510
202-224-5941

http://markudall.senate.gov

Aide to Senator Udall:

Wanda Cason
970-247-1047
877-768-3255
Wanda_Cason@MarkUdall.senate.gov

U.S. Senator Michael Bennet

702 Hart Senate Office Building

Washington, DC 20510
202-224-5852

http://bennet.senate.gov/contact

Aide to Senator Bennet:

Charlotte Bobicki
970-259-1710
Charlotte_Bobicki@bennet.senate.gov

.......................................................................................................................