TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 20, 2018
Index of VWC-EIS, Objection Issues and Responses. 33 issues addressed
United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service
Rocky Mountain Regional Office
Response to Objections on the Village at Wolf Creek Access Project, Rio Grande National Forest
My post of the "Index of the VWC-EIS, Objection Issues and Responses" has been amazingly well visited. Ironically, I also put together a series of posts of highlights from those 33 responses. Then I ran out of steam and it didn't seem important, and other matters were, and I was gone, now I'm thinking perhaps it's more important than I thought and that it would be good to post them after all.
___________________________________________________________________
United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service
Rocky Mountain Regional Office
Response to Objections on the Village at Wolf Creek Access Project, Rio Grande National Forest
November 2018
Village at Wolf Creek Access Project Draft 11/15/18
Objection Issues and Responses
Contents
Issue 29: Bias and proponent control of the third party NEPA contractor was built into the contract
Issue 30: Failure to consider new information
Issue 31: Failure to consider the best available science
Issue 32: Failure to adhere to NEPA’s public involvement mandates
Issue 33: Reasonable use and enjoyment that minimizes environmental effects requires an analysis of the visual effects to the congressionally designated Continental Divide National Scenic Trail
