TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 20, 2018
Index of VWC-EIS, Objection Issues and Responses. 33 issues addressed
United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service
Rocky Mountain Regional Office
Response to Objections on the Village at Wolf Creek Access Project, Rio Grande National Forest
My post of the "Index of the VWC-EIS, Objection Issues and Responses" has been amazingly well visited. Ironically, I also put together a series of posts of highlights from those 33 responses. Then I ran out of steam and it didn't seem important, and other matters were, and I was gone, now I'm thinking perhaps it's more important than I thought and that it would be good to post them after all.
___________________________________________________________________
United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service
Rocky Mountain Regional Office
Response to Objections on the Village at Wolf Creek Access Project, Rio Grande National Forest
November 2018
Village at Wolf Creek Access Project Draft 11/15/18
Objection Issues and Responses
Objection Issues and Responses
Contents
Issue 3: The Forest Service has never made Leavell-McCombs Joint Venture’s proposal (ANILCA alternative) available for review by the public or other local, State, and Federal agencies with jurisdiction and control over the Wolf Creek Ski Area complex
Issue 4: The purpose and need and designation of the NEPA “Federal Action” are invalid
Issue 5: The FEIS perpetuates the same structural flaws addressed by the previous injunction and settlement
Issue 6: The range of alternatives considered is inappropriately narrow
