Saturday, July 18, 2015

Alberta Park (Wolf Creek) Construction Moratorium July 15, 2015

Edited Saturday evening 6/18/2015

I've been out of state traveling untethered from the internet, so it was a nice homecoming surprise to read the Durango Herald's July 15th story by Peter Marcus reporting on a new VWC development, pun intended.  Leavell McCombs Joint Venture agrees not to conduct any on-site construction activity until after the current lawsuit is settled.

The lawsuit objects to various failures in the EIS process along with its unjustifiably narrow scope of review.  

It seems to me the best way to describe the problem is that the Rio Grande National Forest (USDA) has restricted their entire line of inquiry and regulatory hurdles on the a priori assumption that construction of a resort must happen up at Alberta Park.  

A judgment call many vehemently object to since it totally ignores the value of the current biologically productive landscape that is the Alberta Park "parcel."  A keystone of the entire Wolf Creek basin!

Towards Alberta Park including Alberta Park Reservoir

Another reason it matters is that this is source-waters for the interstate, international Rio Grande River.

Image from "Cry Wolf Creek: fanatic following at Colorado's snowiest spot" June 28, 2010


From under Elma's chairlift towards Alberta Park and a pond.

The following is the official press release giving further details.

For Immediate Release: July 14, 2015

No Construction on Wolf Creek Pass until Lawsuit is Decided

Denver, CO – Conservation organizations, the U.S. Forest Service, and the Leavell-McCombs Joint Venture signed an agreement today that will halt all construction and development on two disputed land parcels at the top of Wolf Creek Pass in southwestern Colorado. The agreement will maintain the physical status quo on Forest Service and private land while a lawsuit filed by the conservation organizations works its way through Federal Court.

“This agreement ensures that the pristine nature of Wolf Creek pass is maintained while the Federal Court hears our challenge to the land exchange,” explains Matt Sandler, one of the attorneys who helped broker the deal. “The Forest Service and the developer agreed that they will not physically alter the condition of the land, and more importantly the agreement lays the groundwork for the parcels to be returned to their original ownership should we prevail in court.”

The land exchange gave Leavell-McCombs Joint Venture $70,000 and 205 acres of Forest Service land adjacent to U.S. Highway 160. In exchange, the Forest Service received 177 acres of a Leavell- McCombs Joint Venture private inholding within the boundaries of the Rio Grande National Forest. The exchange would give the developer expanded highway access needed to construct the “Village at Wolf Creek,” a development of condos, townhomes, hotels and retail stores for up to 8,000 people.

“Of course, we would have preferred for the Forest Service to do their job correctly and complete a transparent and thorough analysis on the environmental impacts of the proposed development,” states Jimbo Buickerood, Public Land Coordinator for the San Juan Citizens Alliance. “But given the situation, we feel that this agreement is the best option. It prohibits tree cutting and road building that the Durango Herald reported might have started this season.”

Conservation groups filed a lawsuit in Federal Court last month aimed at stopping the land exchange and ensuring that the Forest Service reveal and consider its full authority to protect the National Forest from the impacts of the proposed development. The lawsuit asserts that the Forest Service unnecessarily limited the scope of its environmental analysis to avoid fully analyzing the impacts that the development would have on National Forest land, and the Forest Service’s options to avoid those impacts. 

Additionally, the suit alleges that the Forest Service used a biased and conflicted review process to approve the exchange. Today’s agreement preserves the status quo so that all parties can avoid the substantial time and expense involved with preliminary injunction motions. It also moves the case toward a decision on the lawsuit’s merit.

“We are relieved that there will not be bulldozers on the pass until we have had our day in court,” states Christine Canaly, Executive Director of the San Luis Valley Ecosystem Council. “Wolf Creek Pass is such an important natural resource; for people, animals, and our communities. The outcry of support to save this area has been overwhelming, with more than 70,000 people signing our petition to the U.S. Forest Service. We are happy we could take this step in the right direction.”

The lawsuit against the U.S. Forest Service was brought by: Rocky Mountain Wild, San Juan Citizens Alliance, San Luis Valley Ecosystem Council, and Wilderness Workshop. The petition can be found at:

Stay updated with information at: 

Media Contacts

Matt Sandler, Staff Attorney, Rocky Mountain Wild,
Jimbo Buickerood, Public Lands Coordinator, San Juan Citizens Alliance

Christine Canaly, Director, San Luis Valley Ecosystem Council,

No comments:

Post a Comment